This web page was produced as an assignment for Genetics 677, an undergraduate course at UW-Madison

DNA Motif Identification


Using the MOTIF Search I was unable to find any motif results using the DNA sequence of SMN1.  A variety of parameters continued to yield a null result.  However, using the mRNA sequence I was able to find a multitude of Motifs.  Using a cut-off score of 95 I found 16 motifs and have presented the results of that search below.

Motif Name

Motif Name

Number of Occurences

Description

HSF

22

Heat shock factor(drosophila)

HSF

20

Heat shock factor(yeast)

ADR1

5

Alcohol dehydrogenase gene regulator 1

Nkx-2.5

1

Homeo domain factor Nkx-2.5/Csx, tinman homolog

AML-1a

2

Runt-factor AML-1

c-Myb

1

c-Myb

CdxA

1

CdxA

Cap

3

Cap signal for transcription initiation

E4BP4

1

E4BP4

Skn-1

1

Maternal gene product

GAmyb

1

GA-regulated myb gene from barley

GATA-1

1

GATA-binding factor 1

Oct-1

1

Octamer factor 1

TCF11

1

TCF11/KCR-F1/Nrf1 homodimers

Dof2

1

Dof2 – single zinc finger transcription factor

NIT2

2

Activator of nitrogen-regulated genes

 

MEME Motifs

Using the MEME program I was able to identify 3 motifs on the original DNA sequence of SMN1. 

Motif 1
Width: 49 nucleotides
Occurence: 5 times
Likelihood Ratio: 275
E-Value: 8.4e-026

Motif 2
Width: 50 nucleotides
Occurence: 5 times
Likelihood Ratio: 300
E-Value: 4.1e-034

Motif 3
Width: 29 nucleotides
Occurence: 5 times
Likelihood Ratio: 201
E-Value: 7.0e-023

Analysis

The motifs that were discovered using the MEME program were all from the DNA gene sequence.  It is strange to see that there were no motifs found using the Motif search program.  I would expect the results of both programs to be reasonably similar.  It seems that they used different methods of obtaining motif information which could result in these differences.  The MEME program searched the sequence for similarities in DNA patterns within the DNA of SMN1.  The Motif search examined existing databases for motifs that have already been identified.  The difference in the search will lead to differences, but no similarity at all is very strange, especially considering that no DNA motifs were recognized by Motif Search when the original DNA sequence was tested.

Motif Search was very easy to use and the information was presented in an easy to understand way. The results were also obtained fairly quickly.  The MEME program required a rather lengthy wait.  It presented a lot of information but it seemed to be of a more technical sort.  It was not the clear cut information that I was seeking, but it was still informative.

William Baader
[email protected]
Feb 26 2009
www.gen677.weebly.com